clipped from: freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com   

Section 230 does not establish a good balance between protecting reputation and preserving free speech.


It’s allowed websites like JuicyCampus.com, which facilitate the spread of gossip and rumor on college campuses, to flourish without consequences.


Many social network websites are set up with a default setting that makes information fully available to the public. This is the easiest setting, and many people just go with the default.

If you find information about yourself online that is libelous or invasive of privacy, you should contact the person who put it up and request it be taken down. In many cases … this will solve the problem.


On the Internet, however, shaming can become a digital scarlet letter that can be affixed to a person’s identity for life. Wherever that person might go, their shameful acts will readily pull up in a Google search.


Daniel Solove

The Future of Reputation,

The goal is for a set of norms to develop about responsible blogging — for a kind of ethical code