The real paradigmatic shift is not to be found in talking about the "two-state versus one-state" solution or anything else in between, because this debate misses the point. It's not a question of proposing a "one-state solution," but of recognizing the "one-state reality."

The two most common critiques of a one-state solution are that it is a recipe for massive bloodshed and that it is impossible to implement. Either or both positions are taken not just by frothing Zionist apologists like Alan Dershowitz but also by well-intentioned observers.

Far from being an idealistic fantasy, the practicalities for a single state are continuously detailed and debated by specialists in their fields.

One State Group

Panels of academics and activists

"attempt to unpack" concepts like bi-nationalism, federalism, multiculturalism in order to "contribute to the long process of engineering a new political landscape that would not rely on imposed exclusivism of any type."