How do we measure scientific illiteracy?
How serious a problem is it? And what can we, or
should we, do about it?
We have many measures of scientific literacy. You
might question any one, but together they show a
steady decline from about 12% literacy in 1957 to
only about 5% today.
The media reply by inventing ways to catch a
child's interest. But does a man dancing in a
DNA-molecule costume say enough about the beauty of
science to children? Is that a rich enough food for
their imaginations? Do we really let them know that
science will feed their natural hunger for
unanswered questions?
Observer Watson Laetsch points out two kinds of
argument that favor scientific literacy. One is
utilitarian.
We
tell them that technical literacy will help them
compete with the Japanese.
The other argument is frankly hedonistic. Bright
eighth-graders don't care a fig about competing
with the Japanese. Nor do they fear difficulty. But
they are determined to find stimulation and
pleasure.